They release updates, small ones, periodically without any fanfare at all.
Little tweaks here and there.  I would check your Legacy Home tab once in
awhile just to make sure you are operating with the most recent one. Kathy

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Charlotte Box <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes I went over it with a fine toothcomb.
>
> As for the release, that was to the room..anyone?
>
>
> On 1 June 2011 02:20, Ron Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>    Charlotte,
>>
>> From the description of the change in the source citation between the
>> Assigned Sources screen and the report it does seem possible that the report
>> parameters need resetting. The only other possibility I can think of is that
>> there is a difference between the Repository Detail, although I assume that
>> you took a look at all aspects of the source.
>>
>> Sorry, but I’m not privy as to when an update may be released (as far as I
>> know the programmers keep this absolutely to themselves!).
>>
>> Ron Ferguson
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>
>>
>>  *From:* Charlotte Box <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:54 AM
>>  *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG]
>>
>>  Yes reading back it was a bit confusing :-) what I was trying to get
>> across is that on the 'Assigned Sources' page, the two mentions of the same
>> source are identical whereas on the 'Individual report' the citations are
>> different. Hence why it seemed a contradiction. No.7 is complete, but No.8
>> is missing the tail-end of the citation. I checked the source and the source
>> detail for both and they match exactly with none of the wording missing.
>> It's all a bit strange. I think what I'm going to do reset like you
>> suggested and if that doesn't do the trick I will delete both sources and
>> re-input them and see if I get the same problem. I'm pretty convinced it's
>> something I'm doing but I can't see what yet.. Thanks for the help Ron btw,
>> much appreciated.
>>
>> I am aware of the scrunched lines, is there a provisional date for the new
>> release?
>>
>> Charlotte
>>
>>   On 1 June 2011 00:24, Ron Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>   Charlotte,
>>>
>>> I tested using the Individual Report. I don’t usually add a source to my
>>> AKA’s so I copied a birth source for my test using the option on the
>>> Assigned Sources Screen. Both sources were numbered ‘1’ with only the one
>>> source description at the bottom of the page – this being the option
>>> selected. In other words for that report it works as expected for me. I
>>> hope, btw., that we are using the same report because you do not mention the
>>> scrunched up lines in this report – which is a known bug!!
>>>
>>> I suggest that you try using the Reset Button on the right, near the
>>> bottom of the Report Screen and see if that does anything. I am puzzled by
>>> your statement:
>>> ”No.8 is slightly different and is missing part of the citation so
>>> bearing in mind what was mentioned about there being no variation I checked
>>> them again just in case and they are exactly the same;”
>>> On the face of it there is a confliction – how can they be exactly the
>>> same when there is a slight difference?
>>>
>>> Ron Ferguson
>>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  *From:* Charlotte Box <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2011 11:33 PM
>>>  *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG]
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I thought I had been specific, however, I'm getting the same problem
>>> on the individual report and family report as these are the only reports
>>> currently using the citations.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have 1 record; a *statutory birth record*;
>>> I have cited it twice; once for an AKA, and once for the Birth;
>>> I added them by using the copy facility in Legacy so I knew they were
>>> exactly the same;
>>> On the 'Source Citation' page of the 'Individual Report' for example, the
>>> entry for the *statutory birth record* appears twice, numbered 7 & 8;
>>> The AKA cites No. 7, the birth cites No.8, I obviously only want it to
>>> appear once, i.e both pointing to no.7.
>>> No.8 is slightly different and is missing part of the citation so bearing
>>> in mind what was mentioned about there being no variation I checked them
>>> again just in case and they are exactly the same;
>>>
>>> It has me stumped. I'm meticulous about my data entry but I can't find
>>> any differences and there are definately only two references to this one
>>> source when I checked under 'Assigned Sources'.
>>>
>>> Hope this is clearer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   On 31 May 2011 21:19, Ron Ferguson 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>    Charlotte,
>>>>
>>>> Please keep in mind that when asking a question please be very specific
>>>> with details. You say a “report”, but the published detail for every report
>>>> is different, without knowing which no one can check your observation. I
>>>> can, therefore, only give a general answer. Provided that the source is on
>>>> the same page (if using the setting for them to appear at the bottom of 
>>>> each
>>>> page), or at the end of the report then the source will only appear once.
>>>>
>>>> However, it is essential that the Master Source and Source Detail are
>>>> *exactly* the same in all cases which includes spaces and carriage returns
>>>> etc.. If there is any difference, no matter how slight than it will be seen
>>>> as a different source. Without any other details for the type of report and
>>>> settings I haven’t a clue in your particular case.
>>>>
>>>> Ron Ferguson
>>>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  *From:* Kathy Meyer <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:49 PM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG]
>>>>
>>>>  It probably is a basic question but since I haven't really used
>>>> reports a lot, I don't have any idea and I will be interested in seeing the
>>>> replies :-)  Thanks for asking!  My theory is that as long as it is Legacy
>>>> related, don't be afraid to ask. Kathy
>>>>
>>>>  On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Charlotte Box <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Apologies if this question is a bit basic, and I'm sure there must be
>>>>> an easy solution so here goes. How do you stop a citation appearing in a
>>>>> report more than once, in this instance a statutory birth record I've used
>>>>> to evidence an AKA and the birth itself?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>> Kathy Meyer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
>> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> Online technical support: 
>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
>> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
>> on our blog 
>> (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com<http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/>
>> ).
>> To unsubscribe: 
>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog 
> (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com<http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/>
> ).
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>



--
Kathy Meyer

STRESS:  when your gut says "NO WAY" and your mouth says "NO PROBLEM"

"To reach a goal you have never before attained, you must do things you have
never before done."
--Richard G. Scott, "Finding the Way Back," Ensign, May 1990, 74

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
results. ~ Albert Einstein


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to