kb,
For your phantom people you could mark them as private and then when you
export to a gedcom they won't transfer unless you include private data in
the export.
Russ

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan for thinking about this.  My main concern is
unanticipated side effects. Placeholders like Mr. or Firstwife work well for
the original compiler, who has Legacy and external files, but wider
distribution and less capable software must be anticipated.  Legacy too
might hiccup on empty fields or "name" duplication - or perhaps work
better...

"Mr." is a good example.  In principle it's a quick search key for
placeholders.  In practice, it's often important in genealogical analysis to
identify yeoman or gentleman social status, and is particularly useful in
distinguishing a socially prominent line amongst similar entries in parish
registers. For that purpose, the prefix field is ideal and alternate use of
the given name field implies a placeholder.  But does that work for other
programs and propagate quietly via gedcoms?  Is the trailing period a
possible problem, or later parsing where all name fields are empty?  I need
to send a PAF Gedcom from Legacy to my cousin, who may further enter the
branch to LDS and Ancestry trees...

Also on side effects, I use Mr where it's not known which brother was the
father, as elsewhere in this Pratt line. One side effect is to add a phantom
brother to the older generation.  No problem with Legacy, which has ample
opportunity for notes and simple procedures for correction, but I don't want
to seed a phantom into some future database.

AKAs do seem the best path for the Richord/Richard mess, though Richord is
only a search key for defectively entered records.  But again, with both
name fields empty, will AKAs propagate and behave quietly?  Pratt-wife has
definite appeal.  Similarly, Pratt-child or Pratt-dau seems less likely to
cause trouble than Unknown for the daughters.  It's all ugly expedients...

Thanks again

kb






Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to