Michele,  This post jumps out at me because I thought you were working on
certification (?) and needed to have the citations match the 'latest &
greatest'...?

More specifically, I remember discussing the whole having to cite where you
found the image online requirement here at LUG, and how that affected (at least
for me) how I was "lumping" my census sources in the source master list.  The
reason then was that the images that are available online are not all of the
same quality, and your transcription could actually be different, depending on
which image (website) you used.  At least, that's how I remember that thread
going.

But more recently, I have discovered that not every census is available at every
website.  (I was surprised, but goes to show I am still a novice at this
genealogy work.)  The 1930 census images are only at Ancestry (I think that's
right... too many papers on my desk...), for example.  So, I will probably keep
indicating the website, so the researcher who comes after me knows where I did
find the image... in case they use familysearch and I only found it at ancestry.

I will, however, keep the website title and URL pared down. ;)
 --Paula in Texas
Researching:  Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle
Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn
Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams




________________________________
From: Michele Lewis <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, October 1, 2012 8:23:45 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sourcewriter

Oh Legacy programmer type peopleĀ…

Are there any plans in the works to allow us to change from one sourcewriter
template to another even after we have several citations already done?

For example, I want to change all of my census sources from the online
images template to the microfilm template.  If I do this, it will make all
of my sources more in line with ESM first book and not the 2nd.  I prefer
her first book because the sources are more simplified and easier to read.
Here is the difference:

NEW
1930 U.S. census, Jefferson County, Georgia, population schedule, Bartow,
enumeration district (ED) 16, sheet 3A, p. 211 [stamped], dwelling 52,
family 52, Elisha Dukes household; digital images,
Ancestry (www.ancestry.com : accessed 27 Jun 2011); citing National Archives
and Records Administration microfilm T626, roll 371.

OLD
1930 U.S. census, Jefferson County, Georgia, population schedule, Bartow,
enumeration district (ED) 16, sheet 3A, p. 211 [stamped], dwelling 52,
family 52, Elisha Dukes household; National Archives and Records
Administration microfilm T626, roll 371.

I CAN do this with sourcewriter but I have to use a different template.  I
want to cut out all of the Ancestry.com info.  With the info provided,
anyone can look up this census page on FamilySearch, Ancestry.com, Heritage
Quest etc.  It doesn't matter.  The point is to give the reader the info
they need to find the source and this old citation is sufficient for that
and it cuts out the fluff.

I tried just deleting the Ancestry.com portion of the citation but that
doesn't work because sourcewriter will not allow me to delete the default
entry "digital images."  (you CAN delete it but as soon as you save it, it
pops right back in).  This forces me to use a different template.

I hope all of this makes sense.

Michele


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to