Thanks Ron,
Yes, I have viewed the marriage list and there is nothing for these children. I 
have attached a sample file for your review. The Alleged spouse on the 
individual report was born Cir 1954. See the Birth, Death dates of the person 
Dan Alexander. I also sent this to Brian who has responded to my request. All 
the children have the notation "never married and had no children". Also note 
the name index and how Kathy has an additional page.
Thanks, Again,
Les
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ron Ferguson
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Odd situation with individual report


  Leslie,

  Just in case there has been some linking of ghost marriages, have you checked 
View>Marriage List to ensure that there is not a marriage for the three 
children?

  Ron Ferguson
  http://www.fergys.co.uk/



  From: Leslie Jackson
  Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:13 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: [LegacyUG] Odd situation with individual report

  I am in the final editing stages for a family documentation being presented 
on this Saturday August 10, 2013. I have assembled a mass of Family Group 
Records and 3 individual records (Children who died before they were married), 
all in Chronological order.
  When I call for a preview or a PDF of the information, the 3 individual 
records have a "Spouse" listed, taken from the FGR immediately preceeding it. 
This is despite the fact that the "this individual never married and had no 
children" box is checked on the individuals record.
  I searched for all available options and even edited the "Report Options" for 
"individual reports" and checked the box, "marriage status" and nothing changed.
  How can I prevent this from happening?

  Example, a stillborn child born ##-AAA-1922, Died ##-AAA-1922.
  On the individual Report it lists the parents correctly and under the parents 
is the "Spouse" field with Data from the preceeding FGR. If the child was a 
male, the spouse is the wife of the FGR before it. Even though the "spouse" was 
born in 1954.
  This is not normal. Am I not supposed to mix FGR with Individual Reports? Do 
I have something check that is overriding the logical sequence of data flow?


  Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
  Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
  Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
  Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Attachment: test pd for indiv_report.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Reply via email to