OK, I have confirmed this is a problem. The correct half relationships are for males the incorrect relationships missing the half were all for females as you reported. I have entered a problem report to have this fixed.
Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation [email protected] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com On 27 Jan 2014 10:54 AM, Graham Love wrote: > Sorry, yes did that and made no difference. I have now also run set > relationships from every person in the family group. All show correctly but > when I run it for the relationship to me they revert to the full/half. I have > also since checked the children of the other daughter of my half-3rd great > grandaunt - they also show half-2nd cousin 3 times removed for the son and > 2nd cousin 3 times removed for the daughter. > Graham > PS Another issue I've just noticed since adding the twin yesterday is that > the twin brother correctly has a potential problem flag ( birth too long > after prev child) but the twin daughter does not. Not a bug as such I guess > but I presume this would vary depending on the name, and hence order, of each > child. The 'correct' option of course would be to have both flagged. > G > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian/Support [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 27 January 2014 15:21 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships > > One thing you do not report doing is running set relationships after adding > all these people. Do that then report how the relationships show. > > Brian > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > [email protected] > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > > On 27 Jan 2014 10:04 AM, Graham Love wrote: >> Still no answer to this - I've unlinked and relinked and run file >> maintenenace. The only other observation is that all daughters show as 2nd >> cousins 3 times removed and all sons show as half-2nd cousins 3 times >> removed. >> Graham >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Graham Love [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 26 January 2014 19:19 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships >> >> Good call but not the case. Only one marriage and all children show under >> the same two parents. Things have got slightly more confusing since I >> discovered another child - a twin of one already entered. Guess what....the >> new child shows as a 2nd cousin 3 times removed whilst her twin shows as a >> half-2nd cousin 3 times removed. >> Wouldn't all descendants of a half-relative be halves themselves? So I have >> a half-relative with offspring who show as full-relatives and their childred >> show as full-relatives (3 of 5) and half-relatives (2 of 5). >> I remain confused! >> Graham >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jack Earnshaw [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 26 January 2014 12:53 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships >> >> It sounds as though you have two separate marriages for that daughter >> - one having 2 children and the other having the second two. You will >> need to unlink the last two children from the spurious marriage and >> link them to the correct one - then deal with getting rid of the >> second marriage >> >> Jack >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Graham Love [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 25 January 2014 14:19 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships >> >> Now this is me, just odd or a bug.... >> >> I have a half 3rd great grandaunt, Louisa Love, who married and had 2 >> daughters. Both children are shown as 1st cousins 4 times removed. The >> youngest married and had 4 children. The first 2 are shown as 2nd cousins 3 >> times removed and the last 2 are shown as half-2nd cousins 3 times removed. >> The first 2 were entered before I upgraded to V8 and the last 2 added since. >> Graham Love >> >> >> >> >> >> Legacy User Group guidelines: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp >> >> >> > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
