On 1/28/2014 8:08 AM, Brian/Support wrote: > Yes, It does not apply to the second twin because the child dates are > checked against the previous child in the list. That previous child (the > first twin) has the same birthday so it is not too long after previous > child. There is no check for birth too soon after previous child but if > there was the second twin would get that PP. > > Brian > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > [email protected] > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
Brian, Legacy does check for child born too soon after last child. Reports > Other Reports > Potential Problems > Gaps. You can set the gap to check in "Warn if child was born less than XX months after the previous child." You should also try to set an example and trim your replys. I deleted six "Legacy User Group guidelines:" from your post. ;-) -- Gene Young Researching Young, Harer, Cox & Sallada With Legacy Family Tree http://myyoungs.atspace.com/index.htm --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
