Yes, It does not apply to the second twin because the child dates are checked against the previous child in the list. That previous child (the first twin) has the same birthday so it is not too long after previous child. There is no check for birth too soon after previous child but if there was the second twin would get that PP.
Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation [email protected] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com On 28 Jan 2014 6:52 AM, Graham Love wrote: > Thanks. Any thoughts about my PS relating to potential problems for twins? > Graham > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:50, Brian/Support <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> OK, I have confirmed this is a problem. The correct half relationships >> are for males the incorrect relationships missing the half were all for >> females as you reported. I have entered a problem report to have this fixed. >> >> Brian >> Customer Support >> Millennia Corporation >> [email protected] >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com >> >>> On 27 Jan 2014 10:54 AM, Graham Love wrote: >>> Sorry, yes did that and made no difference. I have now also run set >>> relationships from every person in the family group. All show correctly but >>> when I run it for the relationship to me they revert to the full/half. I >>> have also since checked the children of the other daughter of my half-3rd >>> great grandaunt - they also show half-2nd cousin 3 times removed for the >>> son and 2nd cousin 3 times removed for the daughter. >>> Graham >>> PS Another issue I've just noticed since adding the twin yesterday is that >>> the twin brother correctly has a potential problem flag ( birth too long >>> after prev child) but the twin daughter does not. Not a bug as such I guess >>> but I presume this would vary depending on the name, and hence order, of >>> each child. The 'correct' option of course would be to have both flagged. >>> G >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Brian/Support [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: 27 January 2014 15:21 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships >>> >>> One thing you do not report doing is running set relationships after adding >>> all these people. Do that then report how the relationships show. >>> >>> Brian >>> Customer Support >>> Millennia Corporation >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com >>> >>> >>>> On 27 Jan 2014 10:04 AM, Graham Love wrote: >>>> Still no answer to this - I've unlinked and relinked and run file >>>> maintenenace. The only other observation is that all daughters show as 2nd >>>> cousins 3 times removed and all sons show as half-2nd cousins 3 times >>>> removed. >>>> Graham >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Graham Love [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: 26 January 2014 19:19 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships >>>> >>>> Good call but not the case. Only one marriage and all children show under >>>> the same two parents. Things have got slightly more confusing since I >>>> discovered another child - a twin of one already entered. Guess >>>> what....the new child shows as a 2nd cousin 3 times removed whilst her >>>> twin shows as a half-2nd cousin 3 times removed. >>>> Wouldn't all descendants of a half-relative be halves themselves? So I >>>> have a half-relative with offspring who show as full-relatives and their >>>> childred show as full-relatives (3 of 5) and half-relatives (2 of 5). >>>> I remain confused! >>>> Graham >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jack Earnshaw [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: 26 January 2014 12:53 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships >>>> >>>> It sounds as though you have two separate marriages for that daughter >>>> - one having 2 children and the other having the second two. You will >>>> need to unlink the last two children from the spurious marriage and >>>> link them to the correct one - then deal with getting rid of the >>>> second marriage >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Graham Love [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: 25 January 2014 14:19 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships >>>> >>>> Now this is me, just odd or a bug.... >>>> >>>> I have a half 3rd great grandaunt, Louisa Love, who married and had 2 >>>> daughters. Both children are shown as 1st cousins 4 times removed. The >>>> youngest married and had 4 children. The first 2 are shown as 2nd cousins >>>> 3 times removed and the last 2 are shown as half-2nd cousins 3 times >>>> removed. >>>> The first 2 were entered before I upgraded to V8 and the last 2 added >>>> since. >>>> Graham Love >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Legacy User Group guidelines: >>>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >>>> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>>> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >>>> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and >>>> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >>>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp >>> >>> >>> >>> Legacy User Group guidelines: >>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >>> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >>> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >>> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Legacy User Group guidelines: >>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >>> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >>> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >>> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp >> >> >> >> Legacy User Group guidelines: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp >> >> > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
