On 1/28/2014 11:26 AM, Graham Love wrote: > Now I'm more confused than when I started :) - perhaps I didn't explain it > well enough. The first twin in the list has a correct PP ( birth too long > after prev child) being born some while after the previous child. The second > twin born the same day does not - I don't expect a PP for birth too soon for > the second twin. My comment was about the logic of that situation - if both > children were born on the same day how can only one have a PP - they were > both born some time after the previous child. A minor point I realise. > Graham >
Legacy is only checking against the child immediately preceding. The child with the PP is being compared to the preceding one. The second twin is being compared to the first twin. Legacy recognizes it is a twin and gives no problem indication. The second twin is never compared to the same child the first twin is being compared to. -- Gene Young Researching Young, Harer, Cox & Sallada With Legacy Family Tree http://myyoungs.atspace.com/index.htm --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
