Many thanks to all who have emailed me off-list. I will continue to be the "point" person since you have made clear your reluctance to incur the wrath of those "defenders of the faith" who dismiss our concerns.
CE From: s...@ihug.co.nz To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re[2]: [LegacyUG] Error in new version Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 05:15:11 +0000 I agree Ron. As I mentioned 2 weeks ago I am discriminated against by not encountering any bugs, when judging by other comments in this forum, the program is riddled with bugs to the extent that it barely functions. . My tree has 5800 names including contact details of most of the 2000 plus living in around 50 different countries. It stretches to 14 generations, includes media files, and I produce a wide range of Legacy generated reports. No problems have been encountered other than the lacking feature of same sex marriages (the workaround for that advised very quickly by Support works well) and the occasional error report suggesting file maintenance. Just at present I am working with the program for 10 plus hours a day in preparation for a family reunion I wish my recent upgrade to Windows 10 was as straightforward and error free as Legacy upgrades have been. cheers from Stan in Wellington ------ Original Message ------ From: "Ronald Bernier" <ronaldbern...@icloud.com> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: 7/09/2015 1:25:57 p.m. Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Error in new version CE, since you feel that you repeatedly need to voice your negative anti-legacy comments, why don’t you just move on and find a program that fits your needs. Obviously, Legacy is not that program. Are there bugs in Legacy – yes, there are. However, I challenge you to find any program that doesn’t have bugs. Are the bugs as serious and as numerous as you try to make everyone think they are – absolutely not. As David indicated, often times, people come on this list and complain about a bug that they encountered, when the reality is that the user was responsible for the issue, not the program. Ron Bernier From: CE WOOD [mailto:wood...@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2015 9:07 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Error in new version I am so glad for you, but the bug list is long, well-documented, and makes it impossible to meet deadlines for reports, conferences, et alia. Perhaps you have simple needs and small databases, don't have deadlines to be met that the bugs make impossible, and so forth. A cursory search of the archive will show you what you have missed and that we are missing. Some of the bugs have gone uncorrected since Legacy 8 was introduced. Not being able to earn your living for that long because of old and new bugs? Please. CE Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 19:41:25 -0500 From: hee...@usit.net To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Error in new version Got to agree...this is a great program & I've had few problems over the years...and those were quickly resolved. I think they are doing a great job. Sally On 9/6/2015 7:25 PM, David Abernathy wrote: I have been running Lrgacy for msny years and as of yet to have any of these issues tha have been brought forward. It appears to me that they are mainly do to ones own doings and poor system maintance. Sent from my Kindle Fire In God We Trust From: CE WOOD mailto:wood...@msn.com Sent: Sun Sep 06 16:59:37 PDT 2015 To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Error in new version "It seems every time that the programmers make a change, they mess something else up. It's as if they don't run through the program and fully test everything except what they change.  I retired as a systems developer and if we had turned out stuff like this, we would be out of a job."  AMEN!  How sad to ruin the great Legacy reputation this way. CE  From: genechar...@outlook.com To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Error in new version Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 16:55:05 -0400 I just loaded version .516 yesterday and already the 1st thing I did brought an error and shutdown. I went to change a child status and got a run-time error 3800, 'ChildStatus' is not an index in this table.  And, when you click to get out of the error it shuts down Legacy. I have never had a problem with this before. It seems every time that the programmers make a change, they mess something else up. It's as if they don't run through the program and fully test everything except what they change.  I retired as a systems developer and if we had turned out stuff like this, we would be out of a job. Gene Harris Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp