On 22 Nov 2004 Patricia wrote: > I'm not seeing this as an event. I'm seeing it as research. I'm saying > something like - Here are the 1871 census details for the family. > Notice that Emma is called Emily in this census and it has her born in > Aughton instead of Scarisbrick as on the 1861 census. John is missing > but I found him elsewhere married with a family of his own. Ann is > missing - possibly married by this time, but where is 6 year old Jane. > I thought she might have been staying with her grandparents, but I > can't find her
I would add each of these items as an Event for the individual to whom it applies. So for Emma I'd have an "Emily surname" AKA in addition to a Census event for 1871 showing her details. Also an Alt-Birth event with the different location. All of these would have a source of the 1871 Census. John would have his own 1871 census listing so further notes saying he's not with his parents are redundant. For Ann I'd indicate in her research notes that she's not found under "surname" in the 1871 census. Likewise for Jane. Periodically I'll search for all individuals with missing census dates and spend time looking for them. Details of these search parameters will be added to my research notes so I don't duplicate the effort. Disclaimer -- I'm not saying the above is "correct", that's just how I do it. Cheers, -- Dave -- David Naylor, Halton Hills, Ontario, Canada. --- Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
