On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Francis Davey <fjm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 December 2010 14:08, Robert Kaiser <ka...@kairo.at> wrote: >> >> If "67%" is not clear in legalese, then legalese is stupid, IMHO. Let's >> abolish all legal rules and make contributing fun instead, then. >> > > There's no such thing as "legalese" as I've said before. The CT's > don't say "67%" they say "2/3", which is completely clear. The phrase > "at least a 2/3 majority vote" has a pretty clear and unambiguous > meaning.
It's not clear what the denominator is supposed to be. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
