Hallöchen! Roman Lebedev writes:
> [...] > > I'd expect that for not-broken-by-design situations, i.e. in > 99.99% cases, the parametric formula is better in any regard. Do > you plan on including these vignetting bitmap profiles into the > lensdb.xml? If yes, how is it going to be made sure that such > bitmap is _only_ added for the terminally-broken situations? Just > curious. This is in its very early stages. I cannot give definite answers. But my motivation for flatfields is not vignetting. In fact, I only mentioned them in this thread because they may help with exotic vignetting problems, and this seemed to be such a problem. I want to have flatfields in Lensfun to fight coloured corners and sensor dust. Obviously, the profiles for sensor dust will be huge (only little downsampling possible), personal, and time-dependent. So nothing for an XML file, and not for a public DB. I'm not even sure whether Lensfun is the proper library for that in the first place. As for coloured corners, I don't know yet whether they are will be in XML form, and whether the profiles go into the public DB. After all, they are only valid for a *combination* of sensor and lens. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
