On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, at 13:59, Roman Lebedev wrote: > Last thing i heard was that exiv2 simply threw their hands up into the air, > and told everyone to not bother them with that problem. > And implemented config file that every single user has to fill by himself..
Yes, there should probably be a project (or subproject?) for maintaining a canonical lens name database, possibly using the exiv2 mapping format or whatever. I don't really have the overview of how that should happen, but it's becoming pretty clear that it will need to at some point. > Sharky comment: any project, that is still using sourceforge in 2018, > is basically dead. The Lensfun software/API project and the lens database maintenance project are effectively distinct at this point, at least in the sense that there aren't really any contributors in common AFAIK. The database is a valuable resource whether the original Lensfun project is actively maintained or not, I would say. The database format and correction functions are well documented... -- jys ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
