On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:04:30 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think the way to retain the context distinctions you get from > > vnodes will be through position dependent rendering of nodes. You > > might need to inspect p.stack to work out the context the node is > > displayed in. I don't think anything will be lost, vnodes were > > basically a display context too. > > Possible, but then you have to remember stuff about positions, which Not necessarily, or at least not for the level of context resolution I had in mind. A particular application (plugin) might just need to know whether or not there's a "@todo" node in the current node's ancestors (p.stack) to know whether or not to use certain parts of the node's uAs. I guess vnodes would allow you to distinguish between different instances of the same type of context, which determining context from p.stack won't, but I'm not convinced you need to that, or if you do you can use an intermediate ancestor. Cheers -Terry > seems like an heroic solution to something that shouldn't be a > problem at all. I discussed this in detail in another thread. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
