On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> it refers to same vnode. Now that I think of it, wouldn't unique vnode > id's provide a more robust (archived) representation of positions than > just node indices? Perhaps a form like foo.bar.baz where every element > is a vnode id. Vnode id's probably shouldn't be as verbose as gnx's though - running index number 1..N (unique within that document) should do just fine. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
