On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> But wouldn't (vnodeid1, vnodeid2) be more durable (provided the we had
> those)? I mean in the sense of being able to move around the vnodes a
> little bit without the stored indices being broken.


I'm not sure we want the "durability".  I think of the situation as
follows.  Positions only make sense in the context of a particular outline.
I mean the "snapshot" of the outline.  Change the outline (snapshot) in any
way, and all bets are off.

Archived positions make sense when writing the outline, and then reading the
*unchanged* outline.  Any other use for archived positions seems dubious to
me.

Edward

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to