On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in responding. > > gnx's are actually tnode id's, so I think we would need a list of tuples to > make this work: > > ((childIndex1,gnx1),(childIndex2,gnx2), ....(childIndexN,gnxN)) But wouldn't (vnodeid1, vnodeid2) be more durable (provided the we had those)? I mean in the sense of being able to move around the vnodes a little bit without the stored indices being broken. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
