On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 7, 1:15 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The discussion about deprecating @file is an entirely different matter. > > People have been using @file for 10+ years without significant problems. > > > > We'll get rid of @file nodes completely in the Leo 4.7 release cycle, but > > it's too late to do anything about this in Leo 4.6. > > > > For now, if you are concerned about @file you can simply convert your > @file > > nodes to @thin nodes. > > I've got literally dozens of leo files sitting all over the place. > Many of them, especially from years ago, have lots of @file nodes. The > thought of a future Leo version failing to load these files does scare > me somewhat.
Leo will always read the files. In Leo 4.7, however, Leo will write @file nodes the same as it writes @thin nodes. IMHO, it would be profoundly unwise to release any future versions of > Leo which fail to read @file nodes. Don't panic. Nobody has ever suggested such a thing. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
