On Jan 20, 2:55 pm, thyrsus <[email protected]> wrote:
> A: The Leo file is the source; the derived files the uneditable > objects. > B: The derived files are the source; the Leo file gets derived. As you and Ville indirectly suggest, I agree that external files containing @all directives should never win a "clone war". Alas, the fundamental problem won't be solved so easily, namely that there are too many versions of data floating around. Duplicate (and thus dangerous) data resides in the reference/local .leo files, in the cache and, most mysteriously, in so-called "resurrected" (aka vampire) nodes. I'll refresh our memory about resurrected nodes in another thread. By far the biggest mistake I made yesterday was "correcting" the problem with my files. Instead, I should have kept the problem and switched to a clean branch. It's always a mistake to correct a problem without knowing its source. Edward
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
