On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:26:53 +0300 >>>>>> "Ville" == "Ville M. Vainio" wrote:
Ville> You could feel more relaxed about future of Leo if you didn't Ville> think of it as a Python programming tool. Use it as an outliner, Ville> to arrange your thoughts and possibly emit some .py / .txt / Ville> whatever files every now and then when the need comes. Or make a Ville> script to read some stuff from your files, create a leo outline, Ville> read / modify that outline and use it to collect, organize and Ville> emit some interesting output. Create 230 config files if that Ville> rocks your boat :-). +1 I also believe that Leo should/could be divorced a bit from its Python inheritage, at least in the sense to present it as a tool useful for coding in other languages. Moreover, as I already wrote once, Leo could be sold better by having more info how it can be used with one's preferred editors (and we know this is religion) - approach done by PIDA (http://pida.co.uk/) project where PIDA provides 'intelligence' and glueing well-established tools together. Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
