On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> In case of what you want and what you have are in contradiction, it's > often better to adjust the idea of what you want and settle for what > you have as much as possible. Custom solution start rotting > immediately when people stop caring about it, whereas something > compatible with rest of the tech out there (rst, sphinx, s5, ...) will > attract passerby attention again and again. The body text of @sb-page nodes will likely be, in effect, an @rst node. The plan is to run the page through something like the rst3 command. So rST is in the mix. Imo, s5 simply isn't good enough, and I don't want to adjust my ideas :-) It should be possible to create a demo quickly. We can then assess what is to be done. > Tutorials like screenbook and screencasts are more about marketing > than anything else. Making a screencast is a *lot* easier, I like the more relaxed feel of screenbooks, and I would rather be an author than a performer :-) > When I checked out the screenbooks, I didn't necessarily > use it as a learning tool. In was marketing for me - it showed me that > Leo is cool. The "cool factor" is important. But I would like to replace all of Leo's present tutorial with screenbook chapters. We'll have to see how this experiment turns out, but I'd like to try. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
