On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rationale is that if you co-operate with an existing "recognized" > solution, you'll at least end up with something useful (leo S5 > integration) even if the original aim (screenbook) didn't turn out to > be hugely important. Let's not worry about this just yet. Leo outlines have the potential to simplify everything. For example, @sb-page provides a context. Leo scripts can use this context to embed "hard" navigation elements into html pages. This should simplifying the JavaScript. Let's see what I, a web novice, can do with Leo, rST, html and JavaScript. I should be able to produce a prototype quickly. That's next. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
