On Feb 10, 11:09 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> This hardly seems like the simplest thing that could possibly work, > but it look likes a reasonable and least surprising scheme, and it > looks like the most flexible scheme. I'll do this unless someone > proposes a better way, or tells me why it's a bad idea. **Important**: the new *code* will be the simplest thing that could possibly work. This is the sole purpose of the present code rewrite. Any design complications or improvements that arise from this discussion will have virtually no effect on the average user, little effect on the new code and only slight effect on Leo's documentation. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
