On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> Some oldish news that may increase interest in transitioning from bzr > to mercurial: > > - bzr development seems to be slowing down, with Canonical driving it > less and less: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2012q3/075173.html > > (there is a big amount of emails to read, and that may not be the > whole story, but at least it's indicatory of something) > > - Bitbucket (the premier hosting site for hg projects, though they > support git too) seems to be investing a lot, and have released a nice > new iteration of their website: > > https://bitbucket.org/ > > > - There is also a third realistic choice, git. But I believe hg would > be a more natural target, in that it behaves pretty much like bzr and > makes it much harder to accidentally lose data than git. > Is that true? You means "lose data" when use wrong command? > (I use git daily and use it as default for my repos. but that's > because I have used git for a long time, and have gotten used to the > tool) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en. > > -- -- Sincerely, HaveF -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
