Hosting at Github offers lots of advantages. Being on Github raises visibility and cred of a project, feature rich, well documented and well funded.
+1 On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Linux development is a world of its own, and git is not inherently >>> more dangerous in experienced hands. It's just that it's somewhat more >>> difficult to become skilled in git than it is to become skilled in >>> mercurial, and beginners can really screw repositories up with git >>> (e.g. by using rebase to squash revisions and force pushing the repo) >> >> Then let's not do that :-) >> >> Git seems to have the edge in coolness/buzz. Do you have a strong >> preference between git and hg? > > I have no strong preference either way. As long as people are willing > to accept that git is going to have more of a learning curve, it's a > good choice (one of the reasons being that it's used for pretty much > everything these days). > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
