On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Linux development is a world of its own, and git is not inherently >> more dangerous in experienced hands. It's just that it's somewhat more >> difficult to become skilled in git than it is to become skilled in >> mercurial, and beginners can really screw repositories up with git >> (e.g. by using rebase to squash revisions and force pushing the repo) > > Then let's not do that :-) > > Git seems to have the edge in coolness/buzz. Do you have a strong > preference between git and hg? I have no strong preference either way. As long as people are willing to accept that git is going to have more of a learning curve, it's a good choice (one of the reasons being that it's used for pretty much everything these days). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
