On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:29:46 -0500 Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hosting at Github offers lots of advantages. > Being on Github raises visibility and cred of a project, feature > rich, well documented and well funded. I should have added that switching from launchpad to git-hub / bit-bucket is a different issue. Different, but analogous. Launchpad seems to basically be covering our needs at the moment, the only big advantage I could see is that maybe github / bit-bucket could unify the whole wiki / bug-tracking / downloads thing, which currently I think we have spread over three different services. (zwiki / launchpad / sourceforge) If there's energy to do that I think we should do the whole thing in a small amount of time, so we don't just end up with it spread over 4 services instead of 3. so the migrations would be, referring to the unselected github/bit-bucket as git-bucket :) wiki -> zwiki -> git-bucket bugs -> launchpad -> git-bucket "binaries" -> sourceforge -> git-bucket and perhaps bzr / launchpad -> git-bucket / git particularly if bzr is not supported by git-bucket, but if bzr is supported by git-bucket, perhaps that part of the migration could be later just to reduce the peak workload? Or do it first with a distinct plan to do the rest. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
