On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < off...@riseup.net> wrote:
On 27/02/17 09:11, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > I am not interested in chasing after org-mode features, unless people >> really want them. In particular, emulating org-mode tables (including its >> spreadsheet features) seems like a lot of work > > > I don't think chasing anyone is worthy, but neither look only inside Leo > to look for *inspiration* about what it can be. > I agree. There is lots of inspiring software out there. - Support for pyzo's client/server based shell. It this needed? Do >> valuespace or python_console plugins suffice? I suspect pyzo's architecture >> is better, but I'm not sure how much better. >> > > Anything that can made Leo interactive (in the sense of IPython, Jupyter, > ... > ) to make literate computing possible in this superb outlining environment > will be worthy. This has been kind of a long advocacy, but I think that the > best way to do it is by prototyping (in my case with Grafoscopio). > Good. We can discuss this further in the sprint. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
