On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Matt Wilkie <map...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The discussion in #562 >> <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/562> is long. Could >> you please summarize the present status and what, if anything, I might need >> to do. >> >> I would like to release the next version of Leo once all this is resolved. >> > > I believe it's now only: > > - Someone besides Matt runs through process from start to finish and > is successful ;-) > > I don't have any idea what "the process" is, or what it's supposed to do. As Terry points out, it's bad form to delete other people's posts in an issue tracker, but imo it's best if the "principle investigator" (usually the original poster) edit the first comment of an issue so that it briefly summarizes what the issue is all about and what the present status is. Imo, major edits and deletions are fine in that first comment. If necessary, create an ENB post for gory details, and reference that new post from the first comment. So, what I am asking is for a revision of the first comment of #562 so that it is clear what has been done and how it can be tested. Thanks. This is a special case of the communication principle, which I try always to follow, that a project isn't complete until it has been clearly communicated how and why the project is complete. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
