On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:47:37PM +0100, Alexander Mai wrote:
> We have some code in test/ which depends on the libraries being built.
> If we have some widget/function/etc. 'foo' should we then have
>
> test/Xm/foo
> test/Xm-2.0/foo
> test/Xm-2.1/foo
>
> of put all in test/Xm/foo and add more 'magic' to the Makefile?
I guess I can now answer myself.
After looking e.g. at test/Xm-2.0/messages/Makefile.am it seems
clear to me that a combined Makefile for all versions would be
very ugly, since it would almost consist of 2 or 3 Makefiles
within big if clauses.
Not the way to go probably ...
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
