I hope we're not going to triple the number of test directories now ?
We have reasonable support for linking the right version of a library
(in configure.in, but I don't believe I've added 2.1 yet).
Danny
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:47:37PM +0100, Alexander Mai wrote:
> > We have some code in test/ which depends on the libraries being built.
> > If we have some widget/function/etc. 'foo' should we then have
> >
> > test/Xm/foo
> > test/Xm-2.0/foo
> > test/Xm-2.1/foo
> >
> > of put all in test/Xm/foo and add more 'magic' to the Makefile?
>
> I guess I can now answer myself.
> After looking e.g. at test/Xm-2.0/messages/Makefile.am it seems
> clear to me that a combined Makefile for all versions would be
> very ugly, since it would almost consist of 2 or 3 Makefiles
> within big if clauses.
> Not the way to go probably ...
