Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jim Gifford wrote:
In my
book patching GCC should only be done when neccessary, to me there had
to be a better solution.
Hi Jim,
Applying that remark to a different context, I guess that means you'll
be dead against lib|lib32 (instead of lib64|lib), or indeed pure64 just
using lib, for x86_64 because they require seds or patches to gcc ?
Ken
Ken,
There are ways to build a pure64 bit gcc without patching. I've been
looking into that for a while. I was thinking about adding pure 64 bit
builds to the cross-lfs book, maybe I should just do that.
--
------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
