On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Tim Tassonis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/28/15 16:59, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:27:33AM -0400, Craig Garner wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Tim Tassonis <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I don't know that much about it. If things should be British, then I >>> need >>> to do it all again with GB instead of US. >>> >> >> My understanding was that, in general, either was appropriate. From >> time to time, we have had arguments about grammar. But if US >> spelling is to be enforced across the books, then I will devote less >> time to LFS and BLFS. >> >> ĸen >> >> > I'd love have both spelling variants being valid, too. While I fully > accept American spelling, it comes as a slight insult for Europeans and > probably even more so for British people to have their contributions > "corrected" to the American spelling. Just yesterday, I talked to a British > journalist about that who quit his job in London because his new U.S. > editor started "fixing" his spelling. > > Otoh, I've no idea how significant the contributions to the book are from > people outside the U.S. nowadays, and I also don't know what spelling is > taught in the rest of the world apart from Europe. > > Kind regards > Tim > > > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > I think most were mispellings in either dialect. I can always check the spelling and leave it as is if it is valid in either.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
