Found a couple more "example commands" that have leaked into the make dump-commands
output, although the markup surrounding them suggest that there should have been any output. In 6.3. Package Management 6.3.2.3. Symlink Style Package Management we see The following instructions may not install the package properly: ./configure --prefix=/usr/pkg/libfoo/1.1 make make install The installation will work, but the dependent packages may not link to libfoo as you would expect. If you compile a package that links against libfoo, you may notice that it is linked to /usr/pkg/libfoo/1.1/lib/libfoo.so.1 instead of /usr/lib/libfoo.so.1 as you would expect. The correct approach is to use the DESTDIR strategy to fake installation of the package. This approach works as follows: ./configure --prefix=/usr make make DESTDIR=/usr/pkg/libfoo/1.1 install The actual markup on those two stanzas though is <screen role="nodump"><userinput>./configure --prefix=/usr/pkg/libfoo/1.1 make make install</userinput></screen> and <screen role="nodump"><userinput>./configure --prefix=/usr make make DESTDIR=/usr/pkg/libfoo/1.1 install</userinput></screen> Was there a change in the way that "non-userinput" was marked up that wasn't applied to those particular two stanzas, or is there somrthing amiss with the way my system is rendering the sources ? FWIW, if I reduce the XML markup to just the <screen> tages, then I no longer get the output in the dump commands. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
