On 09/10/2018 11:10 PM, Kevin Buckley wrote:
On 11 September 2018 at 00:38, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
As far as I know, that target is no longer used. Just ignore it.
We will leave it alone though in case we want to resurrect it at some
time in the future.
Well, the Makefile is broken for this target, because it uses
$(RENDERTMP)/lfs-html.xml, but the generation of this file has been
commented out. The simple fix is to replace $(RENDERTMP)/lfs-html.xml with
$(RENDERTMP)/lfs-full.xml.
Note that I amazed "make dump-commands" did not fail completely. It did
for me, and this is the expected behavior...
Then the file stylesheets/dump-commands.xsl should be replaced with the
one from the blfs repo (well, note quite, it needs some editing too).
I can do that, unless there is a strong opposition...
Still, the examples in About SBU's should be made similar to the others in
the book (that is removing <userinput> tags, or add role="nodump").
I have no problem with you making those changes, but will raise the issue of
whether the dump-commands is useful at all. Why not just remove the
dump-commands target from the Makefile?
But it seems to do exactly what its name suggests it should,
if run as part of the "all:" target.
Indeed, I have been comparing it's output with the commands
I ran for an 8.0 LFS build, that I had saved by hand (so as to
add extra XML into my local copy of the 8.3 Book), and, give
or take a few expected differences, it's a match.
If anything the "dump-commands" target is a useful test of whether
the "examples" and "real commands" are marked up correctly, no ?
jhalfs does that. Check it out.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
