On Friday, June 13, 2014 11:46:21 PM Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/13/2014 09:34 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> > Getting ready to build LFS-7.5 and want to "head off" some situations
> > before I begin. Somewhere in my last {,B}LFS build, I lost--or never
> > had--the ability to run "su" or "su -" Yes, I have sudo, but I use the
> > Package Users--I know, I know--System and need "su." I have PAM
> > installed currently and used Christopher Gregory's solution, documented
> > on a recent post to "blfs-dev" and copied /etc/pam.d/su to
> > /etc/pam.d/su-1. This did not solve the situation.
> >
> > Here is the result of running
> >
> >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 shadow-4.1.5.1 shadow-4.1.5.1 135159 Dec 11 2013 su
> >
> > Does "su" need to be owned by root or run suid to work? Do the files in
> > /etc/pam.d need to be owned by root?
> >
> > I know that PAM is a BLFS thing and I've never used it before my last
> > build. Needed it to satisfy dependencies for BLFS packages that I
> > wanted to use.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
>
> I don't really know what are you pointing at. Shadow will install "su"
> binary without PAM at all. You won't have any "su" executable in /tools
> though since no package installs it anymore. You could try and install
> shadow in there if you really need it, but imho, package users is really
> terrible packaging method. I think Fernando uses paco or something like
> that, and that sounds more elegant to me.
I use rpm as a package manager and it works well.
I build it into /tools and then use spec files for the chapter-6 and later
builds.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
