Hazel Russman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:29:23 +0200 "Armin K." <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 08/24/2014 06:18 PM, Hazel Russman wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:21:57 +0200 "Armin K." <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello everyone,
While a bit ahead of planned schedule, I am pleased to announce
the first release candidate of the Linux From Scratch 7.6
systemd book. This release brings updates to 27 packages since
7.5 release, including GCC-4.9.1, Glibc-2.20 (*), Linux-3.16.1,
Perl-5.20.0 and systemd-216 among others. For a full list of
changes, consult the "What's new since the last release"
available from [1] and "ChangeLog" available from [2].
I just looked at the new LFS book and the builds for e2fsprogs
and inetutils still refer to an earlier (rather than a later)
build of util-linux.
I'm sorry, I don't understand what are you refering to?
If you mean by using the util-linux from chapter5, then yes -
that's why we build it there.
No, I mean the disabling of certain programs/libraries within these
packages when they are built in Chapter 6 because the util-linux
versions are preferred. Since the util-linux build itself has been
moved from earlier in this chapter to near the end, that should be
reflected in the explanatory text. This error occurs in version 7.5
too but I thought it had been corrected in the SVN.
I'm afraid I don't understand either. Specifically what
packages/programs/libraries do you mean? Is the only issue explanatory
text?
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
