On 08/25/2014 12:53 PM, Hazel Russman wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:22:10 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2014 07:58 PM, Armin K. wrote:
>>>> On 08/24/2014 07:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>>> Hazel Russman wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:29:23 +0200 "Armin K." <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08/24/2014 06:18 PM, Hazel Russman wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:21:57 +0200 "Armin K." <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While a bit ahead of planned schedule, I am pleased to announce
>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of the Linux From Scratch 7.6
>>>>>>>>> systemd book. This release brings updates to 27 packages since
>>>>>>>>> 7.5 release, including GCC-4.9.1, Glibc-2.20 (*), Linux-3.16.1,
>>>>>>>>> Perl-5.20.0 and systemd-216 among others. For a full list of
>>>>>>>>> changes, consult the "What's new since the last release"
>>>>>>>>> available from [1] and "ChangeLog" available from [2].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just looked at the new LFS book and the builds for e2fsprogs
>>>>>>>> and inetutils still refer to an earlier (rather than a later)
>>>>>>>> build of util-linux.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm sorry, I don't understand what are you refering to?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you mean by using the util-linux from chapter5, then yes -
>>>>>>> that's why we build it there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I mean the disabling of certain programs/libraries within these
>>>>>> packages when they are built in Chapter 6 because the util-linux
>>>>>> versions are preferred. Since the util-linux build itself has been
>>>>>> moved from earlier in this chapter to near the end, that should be
>>>>>> reflected in the explanatory text. This error occurs in version 7.5
>>>>>> too but I thought it had been corrected in the SVN.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm afraid I don't understand either.  Specifically what
>>>>> packages/programs/libraries do you mean?  Is the only issue explanatory
>>>>> text?
>>
>>>>   --disable-*
>>>>
>>>>      This prevents E2fsprogs from building and installing the libuuid and
>>>> libblkid libraries, the uuidd daemon, and the fsck wrapper, as
>>>> Util-Linux installed all of them earlier.
>>>>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>
>>>> Maybe this?
>>>>
>>>> I still fail to see anything on inetutils page.
>>>>
>>>
>>>   --disable-logger
>>>
>>>      This option prevents Inetutils from installing the logger program,
>>> which is used by scripts to pass messages to the System Log Daemon. Do
>>> not install it because Util-linux installed a version earlier.
>>>                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> I see it now.
>>>
>>> Hazel, is this what you were refering to?
> 
> Yes, exactly. But I followed the link in the first email of this thread and 
> it lead me to a version that still hadn't been corrected.

The 7.6-rc1 is a fixed version. Any changes made in svn won't be visible
in -rc1, only in latest development. However, I haven't got around to
merge the changes just yet, they are only fixed in main lfs book.


-- 
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to