On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:22:10 -0500 Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Armin K. wrote: > > On 08/24/2014 07:58 PM, Armin K. wrote: > >> On 08/24/2014 07:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >>> Hazel Russman wrote: > >>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:29:23 +0200 "Armin K." <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 08/24/2014 06:18 PM, Hazel Russman wrote: > >>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:21:57 +0200 "Armin K." <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello everyone, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> While a bit ahead of planned schedule, I am pleased to announce > >>>>>>> the first release candidate of the Linux From Scratch 7.6 > >>>>>>> systemd book. This release brings updates to 27 packages since > >>>>>>> 7.5 release, including GCC-4.9.1, Glibc-2.20 (*), Linux-3.16.1, > >>>>>>> Perl-5.20.0 and systemd-216 among others. For a full list of > >>>>>>> changes, consult the "What's new since the last release" > >>>>>>> available from [1] and "ChangeLog" available from [2]. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I just looked at the new LFS book and the builds for e2fsprogs > >>>>>> and inetutils still refer to an earlier (rather than a later) > >>>>>> build of util-linux. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm sorry, I don't understand what are you refering to? > >>>>> > >>>>> If you mean by using the util-linux from chapter5, then yes - > >>>>> that's why we build it there. > >>>>> > >>>> No, I mean the disabling of certain programs/libraries within these > >>>> packages when they are built in Chapter 6 because the util-linux > >>>> versions are preferred. Since the util-linux build itself has been > >>>> moved from earlier in this chapter to near the end, that should be > >>>> reflected in the explanatory text. This error occurs in version 7.5 > >>>> too but I thought it had been corrected in the SVN. > >>> > >>> I'm afraid I don't understand either. Specifically what > >>> packages/programs/libraries do you mean? Is the only issue explanatory > >>> text? > > >> --disable-* > >> > >> This prevents E2fsprogs from building and installing the libuuid and > >> libblkid libraries, the uuidd daemon, and the fsck wrapper, as > >> Util-Linux installed all of them earlier. > >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> > >> Maybe this? > >> > >> I still fail to see anything on inetutils page. > >> > > > > --disable-logger > > > > This option prevents Inetutils from installing the logger program, > > which is used by scripts to pass messages to the System Log Daemon. Do > > not install it because Util-linux installed a version earlier. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > I see it now. > > > > Hazel, is this what you were refering to? Yes, exactly. But I followed the link in the first email of this thread and it lead me to a version that still hadn't been corrected. > > Fixed at revision 10730. > > -- Bruce > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style -- Hazel Russman <[email protected]> -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
