On 09-11-2014 00:50, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Might be the jpeg symlinks! >> >> With turbo, the libjpeg.so.7 or libjpeg.so.8 version is ostensibly >> older than what jpegsrc provided. When ldconfig runs, e.g. during >> the SM or firefox install, it will see that and remake the symlink >> to point to the jpegsrc version. >> >> My ff upgrade script now checks to see what version libjpeg.so is >> pointing to (8.0.2 on LFS-7.6), then checks what .so.7 or .so.8 >> pointed to [ on old systems with jpegsrcv7 I used to build turbo as >> if it was v7 when I upgraded to it ] and if necessary remakes the >> symlinks to point to the turbo version. I guess I might now have >> got rid of all my systems which originally used jpegsrc, but I'm not >> sure, so for the moment I keep my block of shell script which fixes >> that. > > What I have right now is: > > 1536932 Jul 1 2012 libjpeg.a > 775 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.la > 16 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > 16 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > 424688 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > 1027563 Jul 1 2012 libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > 956 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.la > 20 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.so -> libopenjpeg.so.1.5.0 > 20 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.so.1 -> libopenjpeg.so.1.5.0 > 564664 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.so.1.5.0 > 805 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.la > 21 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.so -> libturbojpeg.so.0.0.0 > 21 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.so.0 -> libturbojpeg.so.0.0.0 > 463705 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.so.0.0.0 > > I think you are saying that libjpeg.so.8 should be pointing to > libjpeg.so.8.0.2. Is that right? > > I made the change to the libjpeg.so.8 symlink, restarted SM, and the > jpegs seem to come up now. Should we be saying something about that in > the book? It should be as simple as 'rm -f /usr/lib/libjpeg.so*' before > libjpeg-turbo's make install.
I agree. Comment would be helpful, just before it: If you are updating from older libjpeg or jpegsrc... I have had this idea since long, with respect to libjpeg, Ken may remember. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
