On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 06:59:42AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > On 09-11-2014 00:50, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > >> Might be the jpeg symlinks! > >> > > > > What I have right now is: > > > > 1536932 Jul 1 2012 libjpeg.a > > 775 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.la > > 16 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > > 16 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > 424688 Nov 6 19:56 libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > > 1027563 Jul 1 2012 libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > 956 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.la > > 20 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.so -> libopenjpeg.so.1.5.0 > > 20 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.so.1 -> libopenjpeg.so.1.5.0 > > 564664 Jul 2 2012 libopenjpeg.so.1.5.0 > > 805 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.la > > 21 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.so -> libturbojpeg.so.0.0.0 > > 21 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.so.0 -> libturbojpeg.so.0.0.0 > > 463705 Nov 6 19:56 libturbojpeg.so.0.0.0 > > > > I think you are saying that libjpeg.so.8 should be pointing to > > libjpeg.so.8.0.2. Is that right? > >
Yes > > I made the change to the libjpeg.so.8 symlink, restarted SM, and the > > jpegs seem to come up now. Should we be saying something about that in > > the book? It should be as simple as 'rm -f /usr/lib/libjpeg.so*' before > > libjpeg-turbo's make install. > > I agree. Comment would be helpful, just before it: If you are updating > from older libjpeg or jpegsrc... I have had this idea since long, with > respect to libjpeg, Ken may remember. > Yes, I remember. It would do no harm if anyone has still to upgrade from the old jpegsrc. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
