> It is possible that one of the drivers is dumping this rubbish. I think so too, but I can't find an appropriate kernel parameter. I thought I found it last night when I saw the word "spew" in the Help for XHCI verbose debug, but no such luck. Still looking, and at kernel patch changelogs.
> I also have to doubt what you say about "introduced in the 3.10.62 > kernel" - what we know is that it did not happen in 3.5.2, but did > happen in 3.10.62. That's all I meant by "introduced". i.e. introduced into my build chain. Because if I knew where it came into the kernel, then I'd know just where to go to be before it, right? ;-) I see there's now a 3.10.63 patch, but the changelog for it doesn't seem to mention this sort of correction. > In 3.18.1 the kernel has a setting for the default loglevel, > CONFIG_MESSAGE_LOGLEVEL_DEFAULT : for me, that is set to =4 which > matches my sysconfig setting. I do not recall when that option first > appeared, but it is possible that you might have it, but with a > larger value. Not that I recall seeing as I was going through all the parameters. I think getting the udev announcement of the device assignment is valuable, and I didn't see those with 4, though I was looking more at this other clutter. > CONFIG_USB_MON=y is fine for me on my server running 3.14. I guess it is, as turning it into a module that wasn't loaded didn't stop the noise. > Of course, I do not boot with a usb device both attached and powered > on (in the past, that was asking for trouble). I assume you have > turned on too much debugging information somewhere. This little thing is barely longer than the USB-A connector itself! So it's not a mechanical leverage threat to breaking something. It's just nice having it there for a quick backup. I'm _assuming_ by now USB software has gotten enough attention to be safe reliable--except when it spews garbage all over the console! 8-( > I'll attach my config.gz - it will obviously not match your hardware, > but if you diff it to your .config you might see some areas to > investigate. Thanks for that! It's quite a bit different in new kernel stuff, and "intent". In this "basic default" kernel that will be initially installed on new systems here, my goal is something that will boot on whatever i686 PC gets thrown at it, with customization to come later. It probably needs ISA support(!) for example. ;-) It showed me I don't need Control Groups. -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
