On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:51:00PM -0400, N. Morris wrote: > Well, doing some more internet searches and having the time to compile > again... (1 SBU is 34 secs for me) gave me this: > On the second pass of GCC the variables being set and the configuration > script needed to be on one line for it to work properly. > It would be nice to have it say right at that part: This next snippet of > code must all be on one line, or else you will have to start over. > Thank you for your time in this. > There are so many things wrong with your post.
1. 34 seconds with -j1. I do not believe it unless you are running at perhaps 8GHz. But that is not an important error, it just makes it hard to believe anything you write (and if you are indeed overclocking, you can keep all the pieces whenever the compile breaks). > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:00 PM, < > [email protected]> wrote: 2. You replied to the digest, without editing out what was not relevant. 3. You are top posting - I think with the combination of 2 and 3 nobody is going to read down to see what you are replying to. 4. You seem to have missed the backslash which continues a command line (provided it is the last character on that line). ĸen -- This email was written using 100% recycled letters. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
