Edgar Alwers wrote:
Am 11.06.2016 um 18:28 schrieb Ken Moffat:
How about ldd /tools/bin/gcc ?
delivers /tools/bin/ldd: line 125: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or directory
But that is not true. /tools/bin/gcc exists !
I have followed step by step the book instructions, and I have already
built more than a dozen LFS systems. I cannot exclude mistakes, of course,
but I think that probably there is a not solved information problem.
What about 'ls -l /tools/bin/*gcc*' from outside chroot.
I admit I have not tested a 32-bit system is several months. They really
are obsolete.
I have:
-rwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4348952 Jun 11 15:59 /tools/bin/gcc
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 149008 Jun 11 15:59 /tools/bin/gcc-ar
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 148944 Jun 11 15:59 /tools/bin/gcc-nm
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 148952 Jun 11 15:59 /tools/bin/gcc-ranlib
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4162384 Jun 11 15:50 /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 4162384 Jun 11 15:50
/tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc-6.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 145216 Jun 11 15:50
/tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc-ar
-rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 145112 Jun 11 15:50
/tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc-nm
-rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 145128 Jun 11 15:50
/tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib
-rwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4348952 Jun 11 15:59 /tools/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
-rwxr-xr-x 3 lfs lfs 4348952 Jun 11 15:59
/tools/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-6.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 149008 Jun 11 15:59
/tools/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-ar
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 148944 Jun 11 15:59
/tools/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-nm
-rwxr-xr-x 2 lfs lfs 148952 Jun 11 15:59
/tools/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib
$ ldd /tools/bin/gcc
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffdf9d09000)
libm.so.6 => /tools/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007f0813de7000)
libc.so.6 => /tools/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f0813a46000)
/tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f08140eb000)
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
