Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:

$ ldd /tools/bin/gcc
          linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffdf9d09000)
          libm.so.6 => /tools/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007f0813de7000)
          libc.so.6 => /tools/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f0813a46000)
          /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f08140eb000)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^

in my case, outside chroot
ldd /tools/bin/gcc
            linux-gate.so.1 (0xb7708000)
            libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb769b000)
            libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb74dc000)
            /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7709000)
               ^^^^

This is your problem, but I don't know why this happened or how to fix it.

What would you suggest ? is there a mistake I made ? could I correct it
? or
should I erase everythink and start from the scratch, as I am just entering
chapter 6 ?. But what if there is a bug in the system ? Would it be more
advisable to start from the stable version of lfs ? And what happens with
William Harrington's suggestion, the interpreter could be linked to the
host
OS? What is the reason for this ?

What I would need to do is power up my old P6 and build through Chapter 5
to check.  I'll see if I can do that later today.

Edgar,
I tried to fire up my P6 yesterday but there seemed to be a power issue. I left it plugged in and today I noticed some LEDs flashing. I tried to restart it and it worked. Curious. It's like a battery needed to be recharged, but I don't know of any battery except maybe a hwclock battery.

In any case I freshened up the sources and jhalfs and started it building. I checked the SBU time and it is 259 seconds :( I'm used to 93 seconds now and can get it down to about 30 seconds with multiple cores.

The host is running SVN-20120610 with a 3.4.1 kernel built Oct 2014.

The system is now working on gcc-pass1 and I'll get back to you as soon as I know anything, but it may not be until tomorrow.

  -- Bruce

--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to