Ken Moffat wrote:
Let me try a different approach: you don't want to run jhalfs - at the risk of pissing off Bruce and Pierre, I can understand that : people who stick with LFS tend to have our own ideas. And you have your own scripts (good), which were working on x86_64. But do you understand how your scripts can fail ? And do they give you information to help identify where they got to before they failed ?
You aren't going to bother me by not using jhalfs. I was just suggesting a test build using jhalfs to see if the same errors occurred. That would isolate the problem to either the original scripts or the HW.
-- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
