Paul Rogers wrote:
So the -j1 run produced 8 failures, none of which were reported here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/7.7/
At the GNU results website I saw some of these errors reported too.
Eight isn't "many", but are these significant?
Stage2-root:gcc-4.9.2# grep "# of " ../gcc-build/log.test|sort
# of expected passes 105548
# of expected passes 26
# of expected passes 44
# of expected passes 693
# of expected passes 87031
# of expected passes 9839
Total 203181
# of unexpected failures 4
# of unexpected failures 4
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C -O2 AddressSanitizer_HugeMallocTest
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++98 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++11 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++1y execution test
Note that these three are really the same.
FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check
FAIL: 20_util/duration/cons/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc
NOte that these two are also the same.11
Lets see. 5 failures is 0.00248%. The tests are run with 10+ year old HW
on a package released two years ago and is two major versions out of date.
I'll let you draw your own conclusions about whether the failures are
significant.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
