i have solved my problem thank you guys. so all the packages that we need to compile (the.. 80 or so archives) are available as one tarball? and i wouldnt have to worry about using the unxz command on the few tar.xz archives?
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Jared lima wrote: > >> In the pdf file of the book, version 7-10systemd. i am attempting to build >> linux from Ubuntu 16.10, 32 bit. >> >> im in Part 2, chapter 3.1, trying to run the command "wget >> --input-file=wget-list --continue --directory-prefix=$LFS/sources" >> > > One consistent error we see is that $LFS is not defined for the user doing > an operation. Be sure that is set. Also make sure the permissions for the > $LFS/sources directory are correct for the user doing the wget command. > > > im unable to provide the output of the command because im not home, however >> it does tell me (from what i can remember), that "wget-list" is an invalid >> URL? >> >> ill give the output when i can. i was able to find the link to the list >> of >> all the download websites for the packages, and when i put the first link >> in, in place of wget-list in the command, it returns with a loop of stuff >> and it says that file can not be found and a 404 error. i am able to >> visit >> the link and get the package downloaded that way. >> > > Depending on what version of the book you are using, you can get all the > packages in a single tar file: > > ftp://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/ > > If you are using the development version of the book, you will need to > download the packages individually. Note that starting with the 7.10 > stable release, all the packages for both sysv and systemd versions of the > book are consolidated in one tarball. > > -- Bruce > > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
