> >>> I'm still on 48, and admit/agree that firefox upgrades are always > >>> something I face with some trepidation. I like the KISS principle, which > >>> seems foreign in Mozillaland. If it weren't for compatibility/usability > >>> issues I might go with something else. What I want from the WWW and what > >>> devlopers want to push on me are two very different things! ;-( > >> > >> > >> I have switched to Pale moon, which I find simpler and just as safe as > >> Firefox. > >> > >> Just my 2c's worth > >> da kiwi > > > > When I last looked at Pale moon (last year), I was under the > > impression that it needed a much older version of gcc than we were > > then using ?
I looked at it within the last couple months but decided not to persue it at this time. Don't remember exactly why, but probably something to do with a bunch of extra dependencies. -- Paul Rogers paulgrog...@fastmail.fm Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
