Am Donnerstag, den 21.11.2019, 19:17 +0100 schrieb Thomas Trepl: > Hi again, > > just as a follow-up: > > I asked the Apache/FOP guys about that issue: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-users/201911.mbox/ajax/%3C4d044e44a7a07fcf688ffda8e8de2724d81a5c4f.camel%40linuxfromscratch.org%3E > > and subsequent answers. > > Looks like it is a bug somewhere in (newer) versions of xsltproc. That > might explain why it still works on higgs. Using saxon6 to create the > .fo file works pretty fine even its way much slower than xsltproc, but > thats not really an issue (at least to me). > > I'll go to file a bug to the xsltproc project (after trying to figure > out with which version of xsltproc the bug came in; hopefully that > testing won't required too much time... > > Btw, added BLFS-Support list since it is not really LFS- but more > BLFS-related. I initially put the thread here as i thought the admins > did some woodoo on higgs in the XSL-stack. >
"Kommando zurück!" I just did some test compiler runs on libxslt and it shows following picture: WORKS: 1.1.28 WORKS: 1.1.29 FAIL : 1.1.30 FAIL : 1.1.31 FAIL : 1.1.32 FAIL : 1.1.33 and finally WORKS: 1.1.34 So, there were four releases which did not render correctly. During the test builds I saw that my machine had still 1.1.33 (same on Arch). Looks like that the bug has been fixed in 1.1.34 which is already in the BLFS-book. Sorry for the noise! -- Thomas -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
